Peter Nicholson
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
787
393
72
10
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 72 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Peter Nicholson's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Peter Nicholson typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 10 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Peter Nicholson's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Peter Nicholson typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Personal Use46
Landlord Win Rate: 65.22%
- Tenant Agreed Termination38
Landlord Win Rate: 63.16%
- Breach Of Conditions34
Landlord Win Rate: 20.59%
- Tenant Rights28
Landlord Win Rate: 42.86%
- Harassment27
Landlord Win Rate: 40.74%
- Other21
Landlord Win Rate: 38.1%
Unlock Full Access to Peter Nicholson's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Peter Nicholson typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
Kong v 2** Jarvis LP
The LTB denied the tenant's review request, finding no procedural unfairness or serious error in the original dismissal of the tenant's maintenance and service reduction applications.
Interrent Holdings Manager LP v Sulaiman
The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction for non-payment of rent, granting the tenant a conditional opportunity to void the order.
Dawes Properties Inc. v Booth
The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction and rent arrears due to non-payment of rent after the Tenant failed to attend the hearing.
Matthews and Patrois v JJJ invest inc
The Tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment was dismissed due to the Tenant's failure to attend the hearing.
The Landlord was granted an eviction order for non-payment of rent with a delayed termination date of August 15, 2026, allowing the Tenant an opportunity to void the order upon payment of arrears.
Kong v J***** LP
The LTB denied a tenant's review request of an order dismissing their applications for failure to comply with disclosure and amendment directives.
Kong v 2** Jarvis LP
The LTB denied the tenant's review request, finding no procedural unfairness or serious error in the original dismissal of the tenant's maintenance and service reduction applications.
Interrent Holdings Manager LP v Sulaiman
The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction for non-payment of rent, granting the tenant a conditional opportunity to void the order.
Dawes Properties Inc. v Booth
The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction and rent arrears due to non-payment of rent after the Tenant failed to attend the hearing.
Matthews and Patrois v JJJ invest inc
The Tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment was dismissed due to the Tenant's failure to attend the hearing.
The Landlord was granted an eviction order for non-payment of rent with a delayed termination date of August 15, 2026, allowing the Tenant an opportunity to void the order upon payment of arrears.
Kong v J***** LP
The LTB denied a tenant's review request of an order dismissing their applications for failure to comply with disclosure and amendment directives.
Kong v 2** Jarvis LP
The LTB denied the tenant's review request, finding no procedural unfairness or serious error in the original dismissal of the tenant's maintenance and service reduction applications.
Interrent Holdings Manager LP v Sulaiman
The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction for non-payment of rent, granting the tenant a conditional opportunity to void the order.
Dawes Properties Inc. v Booth
The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction and rent arrears due to non-payment of rent after the Tenant failed to attend the hearing.
Matthews and Patrois v JJJ invest inc
The Tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment was dismissed due to the Tenant's failure to attend the hearing.
The Landlord was granted an eviction order for non-payment of rent with a delayed termination date of August 15, 2026, allowing the Tenant an opportunity to void the order upon payment of arrears.
Kong v J***** LP
The LTB denied a tenant's review request of an order dismissing their applications for failure to comply with disclosure and amendment directives.
Kong v 2** Jarvis LP
The LTB denied the tenant's review request, finding no procedural unfairness or serious error in the original dismissal of the tenant's maintenance and service reduction applications.
Interrent Holdings Manager LP v Sulaiman
The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction for non-payment of rent, granting the tenant a conditional opportunity to void the order.
Dawes Properties Inc. v Booth
The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction and rent arrears due to non-payment of rent after the Tenant failed to attend the hearing.
Matthews and Patrois v JJJ invest inc
The Tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment was dismissed due to the Tenant's failure to attend the hearing.
The Landlord was granted an eviction order for non-payment of rent with a delayed termination date of August 15, 2026, allowing the Tenant an opportunity to void the order upon payment of arrears.
Kong v J***** LP
The LTB denied a tenant's review request of an order dismissing their applications for failure to comply with disclosure and amendment directives.
Unlock Full Access to Peter Nicholson's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Peter Nicholson typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
When Rent Is Not Paid: What Landlords and Tenants Need to Know in Ontario
A comprehensive guide to understanding the legal process, rights, and remedies when rent payments fall behind in Ontario's rental market.
When Payment Plans Fail: Understanding Breach of Conditional Orders and Second Chances at the LTB
Exploring what happens when tenants default on LTB-ordered payment plans, the strict consequences of breaching conditional orders, and the rare circumstances where further relief might be granted in Ontario.
The Evidence Game: How to Build a Winning Case at the LTB Through Proper Documentation and Witness Testimony
Master the art of evidence preparation and witness testimony at the Landlord and Tenant Board. Learn what types of evidence are accepted, how to avoid hearsay pitfalls, and strategies for presenting compelling cases.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform